There are no nationally prescribed levels or values for TLR payments. Schools will decide:
There are two TLR bands with prescribed minima and maxima:
More than one level of payment is possible within these limits.
To qualify for any TLR payment:
It could involve:
TLR1 also requires management responsibility for a significant number of people.
Payments are spot values and are not part of a scale. More than one level is possible in each band:
Cash safeguarding is for three years only.
The difference between existing management allowances and any TLR awarded will be safeguarded.
It may be lost earlier due to promotion or incremental progression.
It does not apply to teachers with post April 2004 'temporary' management allowances.
Additional responsibility or work may be required to retain safeguarding.
TLRs to be introduced from 1st January 2006.
MAs to be abolished after 31st December 2005.
Staffing structures to be reviewed and revised by 31st December 2005.
Three year transition to new structures.
TLRs should not be used for SEN, recruitment and retention, or for performance. They should be permanent payments except for cover for secondments, maternity leave or vacancies pending a permanent appointment.
Schools are required to:
Schools are not required to alter the structure, only to determine how to implement TLRs in place of MAs.
The NUT's position is 'no detriment' and minimum changes. There is no need to alter or reduce existing payments or teaching posts. There is a mismatch between MAs and TLRs:
The NUT strongly believes that there is a case for maintaining the existing staffing structure:
The three year transition period is between 1st January 2006 and 31st December 2008. The NUT's advice is that schools should, where possible, implement immediately.
The NUT believes that as far as possible schools should retain the existing structure. This avoids unnecessary workload, disruption, disaffection and opposition. City of Leicester Teachers' Association has committed itself to action if members lose pay as a result of these changes.
"If people lose money they are not going to lose their total salaries. People are talking as though they are going to lose their livelihoods."
— Chris Keates, NASUWT General Secretary, commenting on the deal she negotiated that may see many of her members lose their management allowances. TES, October 2004.
For INDEPENDENT advice, support and protection, there's still the NUT.